|
BHP Billiton's premium rating remained under attack yesterday as the
market was left to ponder the implications of the shock departure of the group's
chief executive of just six months, Brian Gilbertson.
The stock did manage to edge 7c higher to close at $9.99. But the gain was
attributed to the overnight spike in copper prices rather than any endorsement
of the board's weekend decision to dump Mr Gilbertson, who is holidaying in the
US.
The fallout from Mr Gilbertson's departure a $2.1 billion hit to the
company's market value remains uncomfortably high for the Don Argus-led board.
The damage is despite support from local analysts of the dual-listed company for
Mr Gilbertson's replacement as CEO, 44-year-old chief development officer Chip
Goodyear.
They also took comfort from the group's pledge to stick to its existing
structure and strategy.
But questioning by local and overseas institutions about the real reasons for
Mr Gilbertson's departure, and fears that it could trigger the departure of
some key former Billiton managers left behind in the merged group, meant that
buying support was subdued.
BHP Billiton cited irreconcilable differences for Mr Gilbertson's departure.
It said those differences were related to ``style and approach" between the
board and Mr Gilbertson.
An inside view of Saturday's extraordinary board meeting at which Mr
Gilbertson was dumped has been provided by BHP Billiton's South African-based
director and Billiton plc director since 1997, David Brink.
He told the South African Internet mining website Mineweb that the board
meeting was long but cordial. ``Suggestions that this is an Australian coup are
off the mark," Mr Brink said.
``What happened was a disagreement between the CEO and the board of
directors," he said, adding that Mr Gilbertson was ``very much his own man".
There were again calls yesterday for chairman Mr Argus to provide a fuller
explanation for the departure most notably from institutional shareholders who
were sold the story in the merger that Mr Gilbertson's deal-making capabilities
would make a difference.
The calls come as speculation continued that Mr Gilbertson's departure was
related to him getting the knock-back from the board on two big-ticket corporate
acquisitions, one in local oil and one involving overseas alumina/aluminium.
The two commodities are ones in which Mr Gilbertson was planning to take BHP
Billiton to another level, leaving behind the likes of Rio Tinto and Anglo
American, its competitors for the global investor dollar.
Meanwhile, the company defended the lack of disclosure over Mr Gilbertson's
severance package. A company spokesman said Mr Gilbertson's remuneration package
was detailed in the group's annual report and that any final payment to him was
still to be determined.
|